<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 NCAA Auto-Pick Page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottkuma.net/2008-ncaa-auto-pick-page/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottkuma.net/2008-ncaa-auto-pick-page</link>
	<description>It&#039;s just like my brain - only cleaner.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:55:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Pettigrew</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkuma.net/2008-ncaa-auto-pick-page/comment-page-1#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Pettigrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkuma.net/this-years-ncaa-auto-picker/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Looks like Selection Sunday is fast approaching (March 15) and the traffic on this page is picking up.

Rest assured that I will have this year&#039;s teams up and available in the Bracket Auto-generator just as soon as I can!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Selection Sunday is fast approaching (March 15) and the traffic on this page is picking up.</p>
<p>Rest assured that I will have this year&#8217;s teams up and available in the Bracket Auto-generator just as soon as I can!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bevo</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkuma.net/2008-ncaa-auto-pick-page/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>bevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkuma.net/this-years-ncaa-auto-picker/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Great idea for a site, and much appreciated. But you can get some better probabilities for outcomes as a function of seed difference from an academic article by Hal Stern and Barbara Mock in Chance Magazine, Vol. 11:1, pp26-31. The main difference is that they find they you need a different set of probabilities when a #1 seed is involved. Yours match theirs pretty well when a 1 is NOT involved, but significantly deflate the favorite&#039;s chances when the favorite is a 1. Happy to send you the article if you e-mail me. Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea for a site, and much appreciated. But you can get some better probabilities for outcomes as a function of seed difference from an academic article by Hal Stern and Barbara Mock in Chance Magazine, Vol. 11:1, pp26-31. The main difference is that they find they you need a different set of probabilities when a #1 seed is involved. Yours match theirs pretty well when a 1 is NOT involved, but significantly deflate the favorite&#8217;s chances when the favorite is a 1. Happy to send you the article if you e-mail me. Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

